Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rick Herbst's avatar

Wendy, I didn’t want to be the first to comment on this yesterday when I read it. It had just come out, like a minute before, on my feed.

First, this is a thoughtful, intelligent, articulate work that deserves to be read by people - not just those with the incorrect / imprecise understanding of gender dynamics, but by critics of the idea that there are two genders, the end, full stop. I hope it gets that kind of readership.

Scientists in biology have long known that biological gender is not so binary; it flows along a spectrum that has no hard-carved notches in it. Psychologists, dealing in the more hidden aspects of it, have created an “altruistic model” of gender identity that still inhabits the mental map of male >OR< female, with tendencies in either direction, but still beating a historical drum of binary-ness as a personal destination, not a human journey. For related reasons, I take deep issue with the DSM-XX model that underscore a “unified” diagnostic model that doesn’t effectively consider gender (for fear of “labeling” female-orientation and male-orientation as “sexism”) for what it is, which is spectral.

I will never believe gender is finitely anything, and critics can fuck right off.

People can’t be told to accept a different reality that conflicts with their childhood right-v-wrong one until they are forced into the fight, sometimes because of their own identity, and as your first reader-commenter said, because of children. So I wouldn’t want people who are just reading this as a filling their clip with anti-trans/LGBQ ammo to start shooting away (metaphorically) at your piece. Instead, I hope people read this through a more clinical view that presupposes only “What if I was not the fucking expert I think I am on gender?” And comes away with a wider understanding of physical and psychic reality. It doesn’t make me one *political* identity over another because I am willing to accept the *scientific* reality of gender-spectrum dynamics. Said another way, you’re not liberal because you’re gender-complexity aware.

I was going to go into some of the issues with the DSM-n failings, but I’ll save that for another day. Psychologists, therapists, and psychiatrists would do well to read this work. It’s excellent, lays it out in a logical way, and is thorough in its treatment for the forum you’ve published it in. Great job! Thank you.

Expand full comment
Cheri Collins's avatar

Thank you, Wendy! This is an excellent essay. ❤️

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts