In partnership with
I. Introduction: When YHWH Wagers Children's Lives for Divine Street Cred Like a Pimp
The best marketing ideas come from marketers who live it.
That’s what this newsletter delivers.
The Marketing Millennials is a look inside what’s working right now for other marketers. No theory. No fluff. Just real insights and ideas you can actually use—from marketers who’ve been there, done that, and are sharing the playbook.
Every newsletter is written by Daniel Murray, a marketer obsessed with what goes into great marketing. Expect fresh takes, hot topics, and the kind of stuff you’ll want to steal for your next campaign.
Because marketing shouldn’t feel like guesswork. And you shouldn’t have to dig for the good stuff.
The Book of Job—אִיּוֹב (Iyyov)—presents one of the Hebrew Bible's most theologically disturbing narratives: a prose frame story (chapters 1-2, 42:7-17) depicting YHWH accepting a wager from הַשָּׂטָן (haSatan, "the Adversary/Accuser") to systematically destroy a righteous man's life to prove a point about disinterested piety, wrapped around a poetic dialogue (chapters 3-41) where the tormented protagonist delivers some of Scripture's most scathing indictments of divine justice while his "comforters" spout religious platitudes. Composed likely during the post-exilic period (sixth-fourth century BCE), this text wrestles with the collapse of retributive theology—the comfortable doctrine that צַדִּיקִים (tzaddikim, righteous) prosper while רְשָׁעִים (resha'im, wicked) suffer—by presenting a man who loses his children, wealth, and health not because he sinned but because God made a fucking bet with a celestial prosecutor to demonstrate that Job's piety wasn't contingent on blessing.
Yet Christian theology—particularly prosperity gospel and Dominionist movements—has performed breathtaking hermeneutical violence on this text, transforming a profound critique of retributive justice and divine inscrutability into a weapon for the very theology Job demolishes. Prosperity preachers weaponize Job's restoration (42:10-17) while systematically suppressing his complaints (chapters 3-31), creating a narrative arc of "patient suffering rewarded with double blessing" that serves wealth accumulation theology. Christian Dominionism has colonized Job's "breakthrough" for spiritual warfare conquest theology, claiming believers must "endure Job's testing" to "break through" into cultural dominance and material prosperity. Meanwhile, evangelical suffering theology has weaponized the frame story's cosmic wager to claim that human suffering serves divine purposes we cannot understand—a theological move that makes God a cosmic sadist conducting suffering experiments for heavenly reputation management.
What makes this theological colonization especially grotesque is how systematically it obliterates the book's actual content. Job doesn't patiently accept suffering—he fucking rails against it, demanding God answer for injustice, accusing the Almighty of cosmic tyranny, and refusing his friends' theological victim-blaming. The poetic dialogues (96% of the book) present sophisticated challenge to covenant theology's neat categories, while the prose frame (4% of the book) offers a narrative setup that the poetry systematically demolishes. Yet Christian appropriation centers the frame, weaponizes the restoration, suppresses the complaint, and transforms profound theological protest into platitudes about "trusting God's plan"—all while serving prosperity gospel's requirement that faithful Christians receive material blessing and Dominionist theology's claim that spiritual warfare produces cultural conquest. This represents supersessionist violence against one of Judaism's most intellectually honest wrestlings with theodicy, divine justice, and the inadequacy of retributive theology.
II. The Frame Story's Cosmic Wager and Christian Theodicy's Monstrous God Problem
Job's opening chapters present a narrative so theologically disturbing that most Christian interpretation performs gymnastics to avoid its implications:
אִיּוֹב א:ו-יב - וַיְהִי הַיּוֹם וַיָּבֹאוּ בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים לְהִתְיַצֵּב עַל־יְהוָה וַיָּבוֹא גַם־הַשָּׂטָן בְּתוֹכָם׃ וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־הַשָּׂטָן הֲשַׂמְתָּ לִבְּךָ עַל־עַבְדִּי אִיּוֹב כִּי אֵין כָּמֹהוּ בָּאָרֶץ אִישׁ תָּם וְיָשָׁר יְרֵא אֱלֹהִים וְסָר מֵרָע׃...וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־הַשָּׂטָן הִנֵּה כָל־אֲשֶׁר־לוֹ בְּיָדֶךָ
Job 1:6-12 - "One day the heavenly beings came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. The Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man who fears God and turns away from evil'...The Lord said to Satan, 'Very well, all that he has is in your power.'"
YHWH initiates this. The בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים (benei ha'Elohim, "sons of God/divine beings") present themselves, including הַשָּׂטָן (haSatan)—"the Satan," with the definite article, indicating this is a title/role (heavenly prosecutor/adversary) not yet a proper name. YHWH brings up Job: הֲשַׂמְתָּ לִבְּךָ עַל־עַבְדִּי אִיּוֹב (hasamta libbekha al-avdi Iyyov, "Have you considered my servant Job?"). God initiates. The Satan suggests Job's piety is contingent on blessing—הֲחִנָּם יָרֵא אִיּוֹב אֱלֹהִים (hachinam yare Iyyov Elohim, "Does Job fear God for nothing?" 1:9). Remove the hedge of protection, Satan proposes, and Job will curse God.
YHWH accepts the wager: הִנֵּה כָל־אֲשֶׁר־לוֹ בְּיָדֶךָ (hinneh khol-asher-lo beyadekha, "Behold, all that he has is in your hand/power"). In one day, Job loses his livestock, servants, and all ten children. Job's response:
אִיּוֹב א:כא - עָרֹם יָצָאתִי מִבֶּטֶן אִמִּי וְעָרֹם אָשׁוּב שָׁמָּה יְהוָה נָתַן וַיהוָה לָקָח יְהִי שֵׁם יְהוָה מְבֹרָךְ
Job 1:21 - "Naked I came from my mother's womb, and naked shall I return there; the Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord."
The prose narrator declares: בְּכָל־זֹאת לֹא־חָטָא אִיּוֹב וְלֹא־נָתַן תִּפְלָה לֵאלֹהִים (bekhol-zot lo-chata Iyyov velo-natan tiflah l'Elohim, "In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrongdoing," 1:22).
Round two escalates:
אִיּוֹב ב:ג-ו - וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־הַשָּׂטָן...עֹדֶנּוּ מַחֲזִיק בְּתֻמָּתוֹ וַתְּסִיתֵנִי בוֹ לְבַלְּעוֹ חִנָּם׃...וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־הַשָּׂטָן הִנּוֹ בְיָדֶךָ אַךְ אֶת־נַפְשׁוֹ שְׁמֹר
Job 2:3-6 - "The Lord said to Satan...'He still persists in his integrity, although you incited me against him, to destroy him for no reason'...The Lord said to Satan, 'Very well, he is in your power; only spare his life.'"
YHWH acknowledges destroying Job חִנָּם (chinnam, "for no reason/gratuitously/without cause"). Job is struck with שְׁחִין רָע (shechin ra, "loathsome sores") from foot to head. His wife suggests: בָּרֵךְ אֱלֹהִים וָמֻת (barekh Elohim vamut, "Curse God and die," 2:9)—בָּרֵךְ (barekh) literally means "bless" but is often understood as euphemism for cursing. Job responds that accepting good (הַטּוֹב, hatov) but not evil (הָרָע, hara) from God would be foolish (2:10).
The Talmud (Bava Batra 15b-16a) discusses Job's historicity and the book's authorship, with some suggesting Job never existed and the book is parable. The Mishnah doesn't extensively discuss Job, but later rabbinic tradition grapples with the theodicy problem the book raises.
Christian theodicy's monstrous implications:
They claim this demonstrates God "allowing" but not causing suffering—when the text explicitly states YHWH gave Satan permission and later acknowledges destroying Job "for no reason." God isn't passive; God actively authorizes Job's destruction for a wager.
They weaponize this for "God has mysterious purposes" theology, claiming human suffering serves divine plans we cannot understand—making God a cosmic sadist who conducts suffering experiments to win arguments with heavenly prosecutors.
They suppress the frame story's disturbing implications, rarely preaching on how God initiates the wager, how children become collateral damage in cosmic reputation management, how Job's suffering is explicitly purposeless (chinnam, "for no reason").
Prosperity gospel cannot tolerate this, so they rush past chapters 1-2 to get to chapter 42's restoration, creating a "patient Job" narrative that the actual text demolishes—Job isn't patient; he's righteously furious and accusatory for 39 chapters.
They ignore that Job's children are never restored—Job gets new children (42:13), but the ten who died remain dead. The frame story treats children as replaceable property to be "doubled" in restoration, which is morally monstrous.
Christian Dominionism weaponizes this as "spiritual warfare testing", claiming believers face Satanic attack that God permits to test faith—transforming cosmic sadism into conquest preparation, claiming those who "endure like Job" will "break through" to dominance.
III. Job's Complaint and Prosperity Gospel's Violent Suppression of Protest
Chapter 3 begins Job's actual response—and it's not patient acceptance:
אִיּוֹב ג:א-ג - אַחֲרֵי כֵן פָּתַח אִיּוֹב אֶת־פִּיהוּ וַיְקַלֵּל אֶת־יוֹמוֹ׃...יֹאבַד יוֹם אִוָּלֶד בּוֹ
Job 3:1-3 - "After this Job opened his mouth and cursed the day of his birth...Let the day perish in which I was born."
Job וַיְקַלֵּל (vayekallel, "cursed") his birth day. The verb קָלַל (kalal) means curse, treat with contempt, make light of. Job wishes for non-existence:
אִיּוֹב ג:יא-יג - לָמָּה לֹּא מֵרֶחֶם אָמוּת...כִּי עַתָּה שָׁכַבְתִּי וְאֶשְׁקוֹט יָשַׁנְתִּי אָז יָנוּחַ לִי
Job 3:11-13 - "Why did I not die at birth...For then I would be lying down and quiet; I would be asleep; then I would be at rest."
לָמָּה (lammah, "Why?")—Job demands explanation. He prefers death to his current existence. This is raw protest, not patient acceptance.
Job accuses God of injustice:
אִיּוֹב ט:כב-כד - אַחַת הִיא עַל־כֵּן אָמַרְתִּי תָּם וְרָשָׁע הוּא מְכַלֶּה׃...אֶרֶץ נִתְּנָה בְיַד־רָשָׁע פְּנֵי־שֹׁפְטֶיהָ יְכַסֶּה אִם־לֹא אֵפוֹא מִי־הוּא
Job 9:22-24 - "It is all one; therefore I say, he destroys both the blameless and the wicked...The earth is given into the hand of the wicked; he covers the eyes of its judges—if it is not he, who then is it?"
Job declares אַחַת הִיא (achat hi, "It is all one")—God destroys תָּם (tam, blameless) and רָשָׁע (rasha, wicked) indiscriminately. He accuses God of giving earth into wicked hands and blinding judges. The rhetorical question—אִם־לֹא אֵפוֹא מִי־הוּא (im-lo efo mi-hu, "if not he, then who?")—directly implicates YHWH in cosmic injustice.
Job demands divine accountability:
אִיּוֹב י:ב-ז - חַיִּים וָחֶסֶד עָשִׂיתָ עִמָּדִי...וְאֵלֶּה צָפַנְתָּ בִלְבָבֶךָ יָדַעְתִּי כִּי־זֹאת עִמָּךְ׃ אִם־חָטָאתִי וּשְׁמַרְתָּנִי וּמֵעֲוֺנִי לֹא תְנַקֵּנִי
Job 10:12-14 - "You have granted me life and steadfast love...Yet these things you hid in your heart...If I sin, you watch me, and do not acquit me from my iniquity."
Job accuses God of setting him up—granting life and חֶסֶד (chesed, steadfast love) while secretly planning to watch and punish. This is entrapment accusation.
Job wishes for legal confrontation:
אִיּוֹב יג:ג, טו, כב - אוּלָם אֲנִי אֶל־שַׁדַּי אֲדַבֵּר...הֵן יִקְטְלֵנִי לא אֲיַחֵל...וּקְרָא וְאָנֹכִי אֶעֱנֶה
Job 13:3, 15, 22 - "But I would speak to the Almighty...Though he slay me, yet I will hope in him...Then call, and I will answer."
אֶל־שַׁדַּי אֲדַבֵּר (el-Shaddai adabber, "to the Almighty I will speak")—Job demands direct confrontation. The famous verse הֵן יִקְטְלֵנִי לא אֲיַחֵל (hen yikteleni lo ayachel) is often translated "Though he slay me, yet will I trust him," but לא אֲיַחֵל (lo ayachel) better renders as "I have no hope" or "I will not wait"—this is defiance, not trust. Job demands קְרָא (kera, "call") and he will אֶעֱנֶה (e'eneh, "answer")—he wants legal proceedings.
Prosperity gospel and Christian platitude theology's violent suppression:
They create "patient Job" mythology, claiming Job exemplifies patient endurance (often citing James 5:11's reference to "the patience of Job")—when Job curses his birth, accuses God of injustice, demands legal confrontation, and spends 39 chapters protesting.
They suppress Job's actual complaints, rarely preaching chapters 3-31 where Job rails against divine injustice, cosmic tyranny, and the collapse of retributive theology.
They weaponize suffering for "character building", claiming God uses suffering to refine believers—when Job explicitly denies this, insisting he's done nothing to deserve punishment and that God destroys innocent and guilty alike.
Prosperity gospel cannot tolerate Job's protest, requiring instead that believers "speak positively" and never "curse their circumstances"—Job's opening salvo curses the day of his birth, violating every prosperity confession principle.
They ignore Job's theodicy challenge—if retributive theology worked, Job wouldn't suffer. His suffering demolishes the comfortable doctrine that righteousness produces blessing and wickedness produces judgment.
Christian Dominionism weaponizes "standing firm" language while erasing Job's actual stance: he doesn't submit quietly but demands God answer for cosmic injustice.
IV. The Friends' Theology and Christian Victim-Blaming's Biblical Precedent
Job's three friends—אֱלִיפַז (Eliphaz), בִּלְדַּד (Bildad), and צוֹפַר (Tzofar)—spend three dialogue cycles defending retributive theology and blaming Job:
אִיּוֹב ד:ז-ח - זְכָר־נָא מִי הוּא נָקִי אָבָד...כַּאֲשֶׁר רָאִיתִי חֹרְשֵׁי אָוֶן וְזֹרְעֵי עָמָל יִקְצְרֻהוּ
Job 4:7-8 - "Think now, who that was innocent ever perished?...As I have seen, those who plow iniquity and sow trouble reap the same."
Eliphaz asserts the innocent never perish—if Job suffers, he must have sinned. Those who חֹרְשֵׁי אָוֶן (chorshei aven, "plow iniquity") reap trouble. This is classical retributive theology: suffering indicates sin.
Bildad echoes this:
אִיּוֹב ח:ג-ד, כ - הַאֵל יְעַוֵּת מִשְׁפָּט...אִם־בָּנֶיךָ חָטְאוּ־לוֹ...הֶן־אֵל לֹא יִמְאַס־תָּם
Job 8:3-4, 20 - "Does God pervert justice?...If your children sinned against him...God will not reject a blameless person."
Bildad suggests Job's children died because they sinned (חָטְאוּ, chatu). He asserts God doesn't יְעַוֵּת מִשְׁפָּט (ye'avvet mishpat, "pervert justice") or reject תָּם (tam, blameless)—therefore Job must not be blameless.
Zophar is most accusatory:
אִיּוֹב יא:ו, יד - וְיַגֶּד־לְךָ תַּעֲלֻמוֹת חָכְמָה...אִם־אָוֶן בְּיָדְךָ הַרְחִיקֵהוּ
Job 11:6, 14 - "He would tell you the secrets of wisdom...If iniquity is in your hand, put it far away."
Zophar insists Job has hidden sin—אָוֶן בְּיָדְךָ (aven beyadekha, "iniquity in your hand"). He demands Job confess and repent.
The friends represent systematic theological victim-blaming: if you suffer, you sinned; if you deny sin, you're lying or deceived. Their theology cannot tolerate innocent suffering because it demolishes retributive certainty.
Christian appropriation of friends' theology:
Prosperity gospel employs identical logic: if you lack wealth/health, you lack faith or harbor secret sin. This is the friends' theology baptized in Jesus language.
Christian "discernment ministries" weaponize this, claiming those who suffer must have "opened doors to the enemy" through sin—systematically blaming victims.
They ignore that God rebukes the friends (42:7-8), explicitly stating: לֹא דִבַּרְתֶּם אֵלַי נְכוֹנָה כְּעַבְדִּי אִיּוֹב (lo dibbartem elay nekhonah ke'avdi Iyyov, "you have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has"). The friends' retributive theology is divinely condemned, yet prosperity gospel perpetuates it.
Christian Dominionism weaponizes "spiritual warfare" to replace sin accusations with claims that suffering results from demonic attack or insufficient warfare—same victim-blaming, different terminology.
V. Elihu and Dominionist "Young Prophet" Ideology
Chapters 32-37 introduce אֱלִיהוּא (Elihu), a young man angry that Job justified himself rather than God and that the friends couldn't refute Job:
אִיּוֹב לב:ב-ג - וַיִּחַר אַף אֱלִיהוּא...בְּאִיּוֹב חָרָה אַפּוֹ עַל־צַדְּקוֹ נַפְשׁוֹ מֵאֱלֹהִים׃ וּבִשְׁלֹשֶׁת רֵעָיו חָרָה אַפּוֹ
Job 32:2-3 - "Elihu...was angry at Job because he justified himself rather than God. He was angry also at Job's three friends."
Elihu's four chapters repeat the friends' arguments with youthful arrogance, claiming he has רוּחַ (ruach, spirit) and understanding (32:8, 18), insisting God disciplines through suffering (33:19-30), asserting divine justice (34:10-12), and condemning Job's presumption.
The text never states God approves Elihu's speeches—he's conspicuously absent from God's final rebuke of the friends (42:7), suggesting textual ambivalence about his contribution.
Christian Dominionist weaponization:
They use Elihu as model for "young prophets" who challenge established theology with "fresh revelation," claiming youth and zeal validate prophetic authority.
Charismatic and NAR (New Apostolic Reformation) movements emphasize young prophets receiving breakthrough revelation—Elihu becomes their proof-text.
They ignore Elihu's theological repetition—he offers nothing substantively new, just repackages the friends' victim-blaming with more words.
They weaponize his "I'm bursting with words" claims (32:18-20) as validation for verbose prophetic declarations without accountability.
VI. The Whirlwind Speeches and Divine Non-Answer as Christian "Mystery" Weapon
YHWH finally responds—not by answering Job's charges but by interrogating Job from the whirlwind:
אִיּוֹב לח:א-ד - וַיַּעַן יְהוָה אֶת־אִיּוֹב מִן הַסְּעָרָה...אֵיפֹה הָיִיתָ בְּיָסְדִי־אָרֶץ הַגֵּד אִם־יָדַעְתָּ בִינָה
Job 38:1-4 - "Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind...'Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell me, if you have understanding.'"
YHWH speaks from הַסְּעָרָה (hase'arah, the storm/whirlwind), demanding: אֵיפֹה הָיִיתָ (eifoh hayita, "Where were you?") when creation occurred. Four chapters (38-41) catalogue creation's wonders—wild animals, weather, celestial bodies, Behemoth, Leviathan—demonstrating divine power and cosmic scope while never addressing Job's actual questions about justice, innocent suffering, or why the righteous perish while the wicked prosper.
Job responds twice, first briefly (40:4-5), then more fully:
אִיּוֹב מב:ב-ו - ידעת כִּי־כֹל תּוּכָל...עַל־כֵּן אֶמְאַס וְנִחַמְתִּי עַל־עָפָר וָאֵפֶר
Job 42:2-6 - "I know that you can do all things...Therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes."
The verb אֶמְאַס (em'as) can mean "despise/reject/recant"—whether Job despises himself or rejects/recants his complaint is debated. וְנִחַמְתִּי (venichamti) from נָחַם (nacham) means "comfort/repent/change one's mind"—Job either repents or is comforted. The preposition עַל־עָפָר וָאֵפֶר (al-afar va'efer, "on/concerning dust and ashes") could mean repenting "in" dust and ashes or "concerning" his earlier mourning.
The ambiguity is critical—does Job submit or does he maintain his protest while acknowledging divine power?
Christian weaponization of divine non-answer:
They claim the whirlwind speeches validate "God's ways are mysterious" theodicy, weaponizing divine inscrutability to shut down theodicy questions—when the text shows YHWH demonstrating power without addressing justice.
They use this to suppress complaint, claiming believers shouldn't question God's ways—when Job's complaint is never condemned; only the friends' false theology is rebuked.
Prosperity gospel uses the restoration to erase the non-answer, rushing to 42:10's doubling of possessions and ignoring that God never explains the wager, never apologizes for destroying Job's children, never validates retributive theology.
Christian Dominionism weaponizes this for "breakthrough" theology, claiming believers face mysterious testing that, when endured, produces doubled blessing and cultural dominance.
VII. Conclusion: Cosmic Sadism Colonized for Prosperity Conquest
Christian appropriation of Job represents the colonization of Scripture's most profound theodicy challenge for prosperity theology and conquest ideology. A text demolishing retributive theology has been:
Weaponized for prosperity gospel—Job's restoration colonized as proof that faithful endurance produces doubled blessing, erasing the cosmic wager's purposeless cruelty.
Deployed to suppress complaint—"patient Job" mythology weaponized to silence protest against injustice and suffering.
Appropriated for spiritual warfare—Satanic testing colonized for Dominionist conquest preparation theology.
Used to validate victim-blaming—the friends' condemned theology perpetuated through prosperity gospel's "you suffer because you lack faith" doctrine.
Weaponized for divine mystery defense—God's non-answer colonized to shut down theodicy questions and validate suffering without explanation.
The Book of Job deserved better than becoming a prosperity gospel proof-text and conquest preparation manual. Job's protest deserved better than suppression for "positive confession" theology. And the text's honest acknowledgment that innocent people suffer for no fucking reason deserved better than colonization by theology claiming faithful Christians receive material blessing while those who suffer must have sinned. Sometimes the righteous suffer, the wicked prosper, children die in cosmic wagers, and YHWH speaks from whirlwinds without answering why. Job knew this. Christian prosperity theology has colonized his complaint to deny it.
References
JPS Hebrew-English TANAKH, Jewish Publication Society
Steinsaltz, Adin. The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition. New York: Random House, 1989-.
Charles, R.H., ed. The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.
Robinson, James M., ed. The Nag Hammadi Library in English. 4th ed. Leiden: Brill, 1996.
Marshall, Alfred. The Interlinear Greek-English New Testament. 4th ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012.
Kelly, J.N.D. Early Christian Doctrines. 5th ed. London: A&C Black, 1977.