Amnon's Rape: The Royal Culture of Sexual Violence
The second half of 2 Samuel opens with David's household becoming a fucking mirror of his own crimes. Amnon's rape of his half-sister Tamar (2 Samuel 13) isn't just a family tragedy - it's the logical outcome of David's sexual violence being normalized as royal prerogative.
The Hebrew narrative is sickeningly methodical. Amnon "וַיִּתְחַל לְהִתְחַלּוֹת" (vayitchal lehitchalot) - "pretended to be ill" - a calculated performance to isolate his victim. The verb used for the rape itself, "וַיְעַנֶּהָ" (vaye'aneha), means to humiliate, to subjugate, to violate. It's the same root used for the oppression of the Israelites in Egypt - systematic dehumanization.
Tamar's desperate plea - "אַל־אָחִי אַל־תְּעַנֵּנִי כִּי לֹא־יֵעָשֶׂה כֵן בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל" (al-achi al-te'aneni ki lo-ye'aseh chen beYisrael) - "Don't, my brother, don't violate me, for such a thing is not done in Israel" - invokes cultural law that Amnon, like his father before him, simply ignores. Power doesn't give a shit about law.
The Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin 21a) tries to argue that marriages between half-siblings were permitted before Sinai, missing the fucking point entirely: this is rape, not a marriage proposal. The Midrash's attempts to find divine justice in the aftermath ignore that Tamar, the victim, is discarded while the men fight over honor.
2. David's Complicit Inaction: The Enabling Father
David's response to his daughter's rape? "וַיִּחַר לוֹ מְאֹד" (vayichar lo me'od) - "he was very angry." That's it. No justice, no punishment, just impotent rage that protects the rapist son. The Septuagint adds that David didn't want to upset Amnon "because he loved him, for he was his firstborn" - patriarchal bullshit protecting male privilege over female suffering.
This parallels modern Christian Dominionist protection of abusive leaders - the "touch not mine anointed" doctrine that shields predators. The Seven Mountain Mandate's emphasis on maintaining authority structures regardless of abuse echoes directly from David's refusal to punish his rapist son.
3. Absalom's Revenge: Vigilante Justice in a Lawless Kingdom
Absalom waits two years before murdering Amnon (2 Samuel 13:23-29), and the Hebrew term "שְׁנָתַיִם יָמִים" (shnatayim yamim) - "two full years" - emphasizes the calculated nature of this revenge. The sheep-shearing feast becomes a slaughterhouse, with Absalom commanding his servants "הִכּוּ אֶת־אַמְנוֹן וַהֲמִתֶּם אֹתוֹ" (hiku et-Amnon vahamitem oto) - "strike Amnon and kill him."
The Halakhic principle of rodef (the pursuer who may be killed to save a life) might justify Absalom's action more than David's wars, yet the rabbinical tradition condemns Absalom while excusing David. The Gnostic text "The Reality of the Rulers" presents a different view of justice that doesn't require blood for blood, suggesting the entire retributive system is flawed.
4. Exile and Return: The Political Theater Continues
Absalom's three-year exile in Geshur (2 Samuel 13:37-39) and his manipulated return through Joab and the woman of Tekoa (2 Samuel 14) is pure political theater. The woman's parable about her two sons, where one kills the other, mirrors David's own situation but also his murder of Uriah. The Hebrew phrase "וְנִשְׁאַר שְׁאֵרִית" (venish'ar she'erit) - "preserve a remnant" - becomes the justification for bringing back the murderer prince.
David's allowing Absalom back but refusing to see him for two more years is passive-aggressive bullshit that solves nothing. It's the same half-assed governance that let Amnon rape without consequence.
5. Absalom's Revolt: The Inevitable Uprising
Absalom's rebellion (2 Samuel 15) isn't just about personal ambition - it's about a kingdom where justice is dead. His positioning at the city gate, telling every plaintiff "רְאֵה דְבָרֶיךָ טוֹבִים וּנְכֹחִים וְשֹׁמֵעַ אֵין־לְךָ מֵאֵת הַמֶּלֶךְ" (re'eh devarecha tovim unechochim veshomea ein-lecha me'et hamelech) - "your claims are good and right, but there is no one from the king to hear you" - identifies the core problem: David's shit governance.
The phrase "וַיְגַנֵּב אַבְשָׁלוֹם אֶת־לֵב אַנְשֵׁי יִשְׂרָאֵל" (vayganev Avshalom et-lev anshei Yisrael) - "Absalom stole the hearts of the men of Israel" - uses the verb "ganav" (steal), but what's being stolen is loyalty from a king who deserves none.
6. David's Flight: The Coward King
David's flight from Jerusalem (2 Samuel 15:13-31) reveals his true nature - not the mighty warrior but a paranoid autocrat who runs when challenged. His leaving ten concubines behind to "keep the house" is essentially abandoning sex slaves to their fate, which Absalom promptly fulfills by publicly raping them (2 Samuel 16:21-22) - Nathan's prophecy made manifest through more sexual violence.
The Aramaic Targum tries to soften this by suggesting the women were later protected, but the Hebrew is clear: "וַיָּבֹא אַבְשָׁלוֹם אֶל־פִּלַגְשֵׁי אָבִיו" (vayavo Avshalom el-pilagshei aviv) - "Absalom went in to his father's concubines" before all Israel. Public rape as political statement, following daddy's playbook.
7. Shimei's Curse: Truth to Power
When Shimei curses David (2 Samuel 16:5-8), calling him "אִישׁ הַדָּמִים וְאִישׁ הַבְּלִיָּעַל" (ish hadamim ve'ish habeliya'al) - "man of blood and worthless man" - he's speaking truth that the court prophets won't. His accusation that David rose through the blood of Saul's house is historically accurate, despite the narrative's attempt to absolve David.
David's response that perhaps God told Shimei to curse him is either rare self-awareness or manipulative humility. The Talmud (Tractate Shabbat 105b) praises David's restraint here, but it's the restraint of a weakened tyrant, not moral growth.
8. Ahithophel's Counsel: The Genius Advisor
Ahithophel, whose counsel was "כַּאֲשֶׁר יִשְׁאַל בִּדְבַר הָאֱלֹהִים" (ka'asher yish'al bidvar ha'Elohim) - "as if one consulted the word of God" (2 Samuel 16:23), provides the strategic brilliance behind Absalom's rebellion. His advice to immediately pursue David would have ended the civil war quickly, but Hushai's counter-counsel prevails through David's spy network.
Ahithophel's suicide (2 Samuel 17:23) when his counsel is rejected isn't just personal disappointment - he sees the inevitable bloodbath coming. He's perhaps the only character with enough integrity to remove himself from this shit show. The Midrash condemns his betrayal, but he was Bathsheba's grandfather - his "betrayal" might be justice for his granddaughter's rape.
9. The Forest of Ephraim: Nature's Judgment
The battle in the Forest of Ephraim (2 Samuel 18) where "וַיֹּאכַל הַיַּעַר בָּעָם לְהַרְבּוֹת" (vayo'chal haya'ar ba'am leharboit) - "the forest devoured more people than the sword" - suggests even nature rebels against this fratricidal war. Absalom's death, hanging by his hair from a tree, is portrayed as divine judgment, but it's really just the absurd end to an absurd rebellion caused by David's shit parenting and governance.
Joab's execution of Absalom against David's explicit orders (2 Samuel 18:14) shows who really runs this kingdom. He drives three spears through Absalom's heart - "וַיִּקַּח שְׁלֹשָׁה שְׁבָטִים בְּכַפּוֹ וַיִּתְקָעֵם בְּלֵב אַבְשָׁלוֹם" (vayikach shloshah shvatim bechapo vayitka'em belev Avshalom) - efficient brutality that David publicly mourns but privately needed.
10. David's Lament: Performative Grief, Again
David's lament "בְּנִי אַבְשָׁלוֹם בְּנִי בְּנִי אַבְשָׁלוֹם" (beni Avshalom beni veni Avshalom) - "My son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom" (2 Samuel 18:33) is more performance art. Where was this paternal love when Tamar was raped? When Amnon needed justice? When Absalom needed a father instead of a politician?
The Kabbalistic interpretation sees David's lament as tikkun (repair) for his sins, but that's mystical bullshit covering for failed leadership. The Apocryphon of Peter presents a completely different model of leadership based on service, not domination - everything David wasn't.
11. The Kingdom's Fractures: Sheba's Rebellion
Immediately after Absalom's rebellion, Sheba ben Bichri starts another one (2 Samuel 20), declaring "אֵין־לָנוּ חֵלֶק בְּדָוִד" (ein-lanu chelek beDavid) - "We have no portion in David." The speed of this next rebellion shows the kingdom's fundamental instability. This isn't a united monarchy; it's occupied territories held together by violence.
The woman of Abel Beth-maacah who negotiates Sheba's death (2 Samuel 20:16-22) shows more political wisdom than David ever does. Her title "אִשָּׁה חֲכָמָה" (ishah chachamah) - "wise woman" - and her ability to end the siege by delivering Sheba's head demonstrates that competent leadership exists, just not on David's throne.
12. The Concubines' Living Death: Forgotten Victims
David's treatment of the ten concubines Absalom raped (2 Samuel 20:3) - "וַתִּהְיֶינָה צְרֻרוֹת עַד־יוֹם מֻתָן אַלְמְנוּת חַיּוּת" (vatiheyena tzerurot ad-yom mutan almenut chayut) - "they were shut up until the day of their death, living in widowhood" - is fucking cruel. These women, violated as proxies in a power struggle between father and son, are then imprisoned for life. They're punished for being raped.
This treatment of sexual violence victims echoes through Christian Dominionism's purity culture, where victims are seen as "damaged goods" rather than survivors deserving justice and healing.
13. The Gibeonite Massacre: Blood Sacrifice as Realpolitik
The famine narrative and the hanging of Saul's seven descendants (2 Samuel 21) is human sacrifice dressed as divine justice. David hands over seven of Saul's descendants to the Gibeonites, who "וַיֹּקִיעֻם בָּהָר לִפְנֵי יְהוָה" (vayoki'um bahar lifnei YHVH) - "hanged them on the mountain before Yahweh."
The term "הוקע" (hoqa) implies ritual exposure of corpses, a practice supposedly forbidden in Deuteronomy 21:23. But David needs to eliminate Saul's line while appearing pious, so seven bodies swing in the wind until Rizpah's vigil shames him into burial. The Talmud (Tractate Yevamot 78b-79a) struggles to justify this, claiming emergency measures, but it's just political murder with religious decoration.
14. Rizpah's Vigil: The Only Hero in This Shit Show
Rizpah's protection of the corpses (2 Samuel 21:10) - "וַתִּקַּח רִצְפָּה... אֶת־הַשַּׂק וַתַּטֵּהוּ־לָהּ" (vatikach Ritzpah... et-hasak vatateihu-lah) - "Rizpah took sackcloth and spread it for herself" - from harvest until rain, probably months, is the only genuine act of love and courage in this entire narrative. She fights off birds and beasts to preserve dignity for the dead while David plays politics with their corpses.
The Midrashic tradition barely mentions her, because her actions shame every male leader in the narrative. A concubine showing more humanity than the "man after God's own heart."
15. David's "Mighty Men": Glorifying Mercenaries
The catalog of David's warriors (2 Samuel 23) reads like a roster of professional killers. These "גִּבֹּרִים" (gibborim) - "mighty men" - aren't heroes but mercenaries who maintained David's power through violence. Abishai killing 300 men with his spear, Benaiah killing an Egyptian with the Egyptian's own spear - this is glorification of efficient killing, not virtue.
The story of the three who break through Philistine lines to get David water from Bethlehem's well (2 Samuel 23:15-17), which David then pours out as a libation, is portrayed as loyalty and piety. But it's really the waste of lives risked for a tyrant's whim - David's "honor" in not drinking it doesn't resurrect anyone killed in the raid.
16. The Census and Plague: Divine Terrorism
The census narrative (2 Samuel 24) is perhaps the most fucked up theology in the book. God incites David to take a census - "וַיָּסֶת אֶת־דָּוִד" (vayaset et-David) - then punishes Israel for it with a plague killing 70,000 people. The Chronicler couldn't stomach this, so 1 Chronicles 21:1 changes the instigator to Satan.
David's choice of three days' plague over three months of fleeing enemies or three years of famine shows his calculus: better 70,000 dead subjects than personal inconvenience. The Hebrew "וַיִּתֵּן יְהוָה דֶּבֶר בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל" (vayiten YHVH dever beYisrael) - "Yahweh sent a pestilence upon Israel" - makes God a biological terrorist punishing the masses for their king's sin.
17. The Threshing Floor: Real Estate Through Disaster
David's purchase of Araunah's threshing floor (2 Samuel 24:18-25) to build an altar and stop the plague is disaster capitalism at its finest. The plague David caused becomes the opportunity to acquire prime Jerusalem real estate for the future temple. Araunah offers it free, but David insists on paying - "לֹא כִּי־קָנוֹ אֶקְנֶה מֵאוֹתְךָ בִּמְחִיר" (lo ki-kano ekneh me'otcha bimchir) - not from generosity but to establish legal ownership.
This becomes the Temple Mount, the most contested real estate in human history, acquired through manufactured crisis. The Seven Mountain Mandate's strategy of creating crisis to seize control of cultural institutions follows this exact template.
18. The Women of David's Story: Erased and Violated
Throughout 2 Samuel's second half, women exist only as victims or props. Tamar - raped and discarded. The ten concubines - raped and imprisoned. Rizpah - watching her children murdered. Bathsheba - conspicuously absent after being raped, appearing again only in Kings to secure Solomon's throne through more palace intrigue.
The Hebrew term "פִּלֶגֶשׁ" (pilegesh) for concubine literally means "divided wife" - women fractionally human, sexually available but legally marginal. The Talmudic discussions about their status focus on inheritance law, not their humanity. The Gnostic Gospel of Mary Magdalene presents a radically different vision where women are spiritual equals, even leaders - everything the Davidic narrative denies.
19. The Theological Whitewashing: Making a Monster into a Messiah
The most insidious aspect of 2 Samuel's second half is how later tradition transforms this chronicle of dysfunction into messianic prophecy. David's covenant becomes the foundation for royal theology, despite his kingdom collapsing in rape, rebellion, and plague. The phrase "לְדָוִד מִזְמוֹר" (leDavid mizmor) - "A Psalm of David" - heads liturgical poetry attributed to this war criminal.
Christian interpretation doubles down, making David a "type" of Christ - both kings from Bethlehem, both "sons of God." This typology requires ignoring David's murders, rapes, and genocides, or worse, spiritualizing them as divine mystery. The Book of Revelation's "Lion of Judah" imagery draws directly from this violent Davidic tradition.
20. The Imperial Legacy: From Iron Age Warlord to Modern Dominionism
The continuing influence of 2 Samuel's narrative structure on Christian Dominionism cannot be overstated. The Seven Mountain Mandate's strategy - infiltrate, dominate, rule in God's name - is pure Davidic methodology. Every megachurch pastor who builds an empire through "divine anointing" while crushing opposition follows David's template.
The prosperity gospel's promise that God rewards his chosen with wealth and power, regardless of their methods, comes straight from David keeping his throne despite his crimes. The religious right's support for authoritarian leaders who promise to restore "godly rule" echoes Israel's tolerance of David's brutality because he was "God's anointed."
Modern Christian nationalism's fusion of religious language with state violence, its treatment of enemies as deserving destruction, its subjugation of women as divinely ordained, its protection of abusive leaders as "ordained by God" - all of it traces back to this Iron Age narrative of a petty warlord mythologized into a holy king.
Conclusion: The Death Cult of Davidic Theology
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Wendy The Druid to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.