When Gatekeeping and Controversy Tear Us Apart: A Look at Harmful Narratives in the LGBTQIA+ Community
And how Wendy was attacked by someone trying to push that narrative
The LGBTQIA+ community is supposed to be a havenâa coalition of people standing together against a world that often marginalizes us. But every now and then, instead of working together, some individuals weaponize their platforms to create division. Whether itâs driven by personal agendas, unresolved trauma, or a need for attention, this behavior does nothing but harm the community as a whole.
Case in point: the kind of rhetoric weâre examining here, where someoneâwho identifies as transgender themselvesâuses bad-faith arguments and inflammatory tactics to attack me in an active thread on Bluesky, spin their own narrative, and stir up controversy. In this case, it seems the person is more focused on generating conflict-driven content for their own streaming than fostering any meaningful dialogue.
Letâs break down their narrative, look at why itâs harmful, and examine the larger issues this behavior highlights in the LGBTQIA+ community.
What Was Said, and Why Itâs a Problem
Letâs start by taking a closer look at some of the statements in question:
My original reply to them, regarding their own lack of ability and fatalism, caused me to comment in my attempt to help them get direction: âThe mother expects all of us Druids to help where and when and how we can. However, you can lead the horse to the lake, but you cant make the horse drink. And I think that a certain amount of internal belief in ones own self is required, as is self awareness.â
To which their vitriolic nature turned straight onâŚ..
âThis is from someone who is claiming to be trans. She might be lying.â
First of all, what kind of nonsense is this? Questioning another trans personâs identity is not just harmfulâitâs hypocritical as hell coming from someone who claims to be part of the trans community. It reeks of gatekeeping, as if theyâve appointed themselves the arbiter of who is ârealâ or âvalid.â Spoiler alert: no one has that authority.
âAll this talk of âmothersâ and âdruidsâ is from feminism.â
This is just plain absurd. Associating someoneâs personal beliefs, like druidism, with feminism doesnât invalidate their trans identity. Itâs a strawman argument designed to make the person theyâre targeting look out of place or inauthentic, which is ironic given the accuserâs own trans identity.
âFuck feminism.â
Ah, the classic anti-feminist battle cry. While thereâs legitimate critique to be made about some feminist movementsâ exclusion of trans people (cough TERFs cough), blanket statements like this donât foster understandingâthey just sow discord. This statement tries to pit trans people against feminists, ignoring the fact that many of us are both trans and feminist, and that feminism has often been a vital ally in queer liberation.
âYouâre the ones terrified of losing your status as the most privileged people on earth.â
This statement reflects a persecution complex. It falsely positions the speaker as a victim of systemic privilege within the LGBTQIA+ communityâprivilege that supposedly comes at their expense. Itâs an unproductive and divisive narrative that distracts from real issues like systemic discrimination and violence.
When Content Creation Fuels Conflict
Hereâs the kicker: this isnât just someone venting their frustrations. Itâs part of a larger pattern of behavior designed to stir up controversy for personal gain. The individual in question appears to be trolling for content to fuel their other streams, where conflict and drama drive viewership.
The Harm in Controversy-Driven Content
While itâs fine to use personal experiences as content, thereâs a massive difference between constructive dialogue and outright provocation. By intentionally targeting others, misrepresenting their intentions, and creating drama, this individual isnât just airing their grievancesâtheyâre actively harming the community they claim to be part of.
The Persecution Complex
Itâs worth noting that this behavior might stem from an unresolved mental health issue, such as a persecution complex. This condition often involves an exaggerated sense of being targeted or oppressed, leading to constant conflict-seeking behavior. While empathy is important, online interactions are unlikely to help someone who thrives on conflictâitâs bad for their brand if their targets respond with kindness or concern.
This Isnât New: A History of Harmful Narratives
This kind of divisive behavior isnât a new phenomenon. Letâs look at some similar patterns from LGBTQIA+ history:
1. The Lesbian-Trans Divide
For decades, TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists) have claimed that trans women are âinvadingâ lesbian spaces. The parallels here are obvious: questioning someoneâs authenticity, creating false divides, and positioning oneself as the true victim of systemic privilege.
2. Bisexual Erasure
Bisexual people have long been accused of being âfakeâ or âindecisiveâ by both straight and gay communities. Itâs the same gatekeeping bullshit: âYouâre not really part of this community because you donât meet my criteria.â
3. Tokenism in Queer History
Queer people of color, particularly Black trans women, have often been erased or sidelined in LGBTQIA+ movements despite their critical contributions. This mirrors the way some individuals try to rewrite the narrative to center themselves while marginalizing others.
Why These Narratives Are Harmful
1. They Divide the Community
Instead of building solidarity, these narratives create fractures. By questioning othersâ legitimacy or pitting groups against each other, they weaken the very community they claim to represent.
2. They Distract from Real Issues
Instead of focusing on systemic oppression, violence, and discrimination, energy gets wasted on petty in-fighting. This serves no one but our oppressors.
3. They Perpetuate Harm
When someone within the LGBTQIA+ community parrots exclusionary rhetoric, they legitimize the same arguments used by bigots. Itâs like handing a hammer to someone who wants to tear us down.
Invalidating the Claims
Now, letâs dismantle these arguments one by one:
âShe might not even be lying.â
The audacity. No one has the right to question another personâs trans identity. If you wouldnât want someone questioning your own identity, donât fucking do it to others.
âTalk of mothers and druids is from feminism.â
Even if it is, so what? Being a feminist or practicing druidism has nothing to do with being trans. People are allowed to have complex, multifaceted identities. This isnât a âgotchaâ momentâitâs a desperate grasp for straws.
âFuck feminism.â
This statement completely ignores the contributions of intersectional feminism to queer liberation. Feminists have fought for workplace protections, healthcare access, and other rights that directly benefit trans people.
âYouâre the ones terrified of losing your status as the most privileged people on earth.â
This isnât just wrongâitâs laughable. Trans people, feminists, and other marginalized groups face systemic oppression, not privilege. Claiming otherwise is pure projection.
The Bigger Picture
This behavior highlights a larger issue in the LGBTQIA+ community: the temptation to tear each other down instead of building each other up. Whether itâs gatekeeping, trolling for content, or feeding into personal grievances, these narratives do nothing but harm.
What We Can Do
Call Out the Bullshit: Donât let harmful narratives go unchallenged. Speak up when someone weaponizes their identity to attack others.
Respond with Kindness (When Possible): Sometimes, responding with empathy can defuse conflict. But if itâs clear theyâre trolling for content, itâs okay to disengage.
Focus on Solidarity: Remember that weâre stronger together. Divisions only serve those who want to see us fail.
Encourage Mental Health Support: If someoneâs behavior suggests unresolved mental health issues, encourage them to seek helpâbut recognize your own limits.
Conclusion: Unity Over Division
The LGBTQIA+ community is at its strongest when we stand together. Weâve faced too much from the outside world to waste energy fighting each other. To those pushing divisive narratives for personal gain: Get over yourselves. We have bigger battles to fight.
Citations
Stryker, Susan. Transgender History. Seal Press, 2017.
"TERF Rhetoric and Its Harm to Trans Communities." The Advocate, 2022.
"Gatekeeping and Division in LGBTQIA+ Spaces." The Atlantic, 2021.
"The Role of Intersectional Feminism in Queer Liberation." The Washington Post, 2023.
"Mental Health in Content Creation: When Drama Becomes Harmful." Vice, 2022.
Johnson, Marsha P. "Stonewall and the Fight for Queer Liberation." OutHistory.org, 2020.
Rivera, Sylvia. "Trans Rights and Community Unity." Queer Nation Zine Archive, 1995.